Jump to content
LaptopVideo2Go Forums

v177.41 Windows Vista 64bit | NVIDIA


mobilenvidia

  

16 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you satisfied by the quality of this driver and can you recommend it for other users?

    • No
      7
    • Yes
      7
    • Yes, even though i noticed a few bugs.
      2


Recommended Posts

NVIDIA driver v177.41 for Windows Vista 64bit

INF Modified | Make A Donation

Driver Information


  • Released By: NVIDIA
  • Driver Version: 177.41
  • Operating System: Windows Vista 64bit
  • Driver Date: 2008-06-18 (YYYY-MM-DD)
  • Driver Size: 40.48MB (MD5: 4402da1d7a09910210711b318ea9cb4b)
  • MS WHQL Certificate: True
  • Setup Files Included: True
  • Languages Included: 28

Information Files (1 files supporting 4 models)


* nv_disp.inf supports 4 models:

[DEV_05E1] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

[DEV_05E2] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

[DEV_084C] NVIDIA nForce 780a SLI

[DEV_084D] NVIDIA nForce 750a SLI

Support and Disclaimer


Please post any comments, suggestions, questions and other information related to this driver in this thread

Please make use of the Quickstart Guide for installation, the Forums Search function and Frequently Asked Questions before asking any questions.

If you still have a general question and/or problem that is not related with this driver, please post in the Support section.

All NVIDIA drivers hosted at LaptopVideo2Go.com come as a maximum compressed self-extracting 7-ZIP archive for your convenience.

Additionally, reduce the size of your installation by using NVLiTE to rip out unnecessary languages and miscellaneous files without losing any driver features.

Driver size and MD5 numbers may not be accurate due to the driver being repackaged and post not updated.

Make A Donation via PayPal if you find what we do useful and would like to help us pay for hosting these files into the future.

Edited by ®®®
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm suitably impressed. In Vantage, I went from P5922 and X2098 (174.74) to P6292 and X2629. That's with no overclocking and (obviously) no physX enabled. That's a pretty big difference. I had a lot of problems with various drivers between the two and ended up settling on 174.31 for stability, but less performance.

Very impressed, I'm yet to run 3Dmark 06, but I'd be very surprised not to see at least a slight improvement there. The best I'd managed with 06 was 11886 and that was back on the 167.55 drivers... boo.

I shouldn't hold my breath, but can't wait for physX abilities...

Dell M1730 XPS

T9500 2.6GHz

8800M GTX SLI (No overclocking)

4096MB DDRII 667

Good times...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably a stupid question: Does this driver support PhysX as 177.39 does ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excelent drivers, recomend these for the people using 8600GT. Got a score of 4407 on 3DMark06 with MacBook Pro

3dmark06zu3.th.jpg

MacBook Pro 15" Glossy | 2.5GHz Penryn | 4GB Ram | 8600GT 512MB | 200GB 7200RPM HDD

Edited by XI Powza IX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably a stupid question: Does this driver support PhysX as 177.39 does ?

yes my 9800Gtx work well with this driver and Physx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scores dropped from 8897 to 8627 with this driver on 8800M GTX....

not sure why but that sorta sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my 3DMark Vantage score went down from 6629 (177.39) to 6577 (177.41). Not a big degradation in score, but it's still there.

My Desktop: Core 2 Duo E8400, 8GB DDR2-800, 8800GT, Vista x64.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DAVEP

anyone else having a problem installing this?

Im getting this error when I install via the inf through device manager

the request could not be performed because of i/o device error

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bennyb0y

All of the 177.41 if files have the old 8800M GTS problem with them again:

%NVIDIA_G92.DEV_0609.1% = mobile,nv_NV3x, PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0609

Should be:

%NVIDIA_G92.DEV_0609.1% = mobile_nv_NV3x, PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0609

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This driver increase the temp of my Nvidia (SLI) in 4º. All the games run smooth less Race Driver: GRID. Physx 8.06.12 installed and activated. Back to 169.55 (original of Dell) and temp decrease 4-5º. Now the games run smooth but less fps (3-7).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went from a 3dmark score of 6452 to 6497 with this driver. Seemed to run well on Crysis and COD2 & 4 although I didn't take any Temp measurements with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm suitably impressed. In Vantage, I went from P5922 and X2098 (174.74) to P6292 and X2629. That's with no overclocking and (obviously) no physX enabled. That's a pretty big difference. I had a lot of problems with various drivers between the two and ended up settling on 174.31 for stability, but less performance.

Very impressed, I'm yet to run 3Dmark 06, but I'd be very surprised not to see at least a slight improvement there. The best I'd managed with 06 was 11886 and that was back on the 167.55 drivers... boo.

I shouldn't hold my breath, but can't wait for physX abilities...

Dell M1730 XPS

T9500 2.6GHz

8800M GTX SLI (No overclocking)

4096MB DDRII 667

Good times...

Update: 3DMark 06 was 11128. That's about the same score I was getting on everything bar the old 167.55 drivers. Crysis runs a tad smoother too. Overall, I'm really liking these drivers. I'll be keeping them til something better comes along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that this is a CUDA driver. I'd be surprised if any driver from now on doesn't have CUDA/PhysX included.

Another update for anyone with a Dell M1730... This one's a kicker. I get BSOD when trying to play DVD's with PowerDVD and a hefty crash/recovery when using Media Player for the same thing. This is REALLY irritating as this driver has given me the best performance for games so far. COD 4 full detail @ 1920 X 1200 flies. Company of Heroes is smoother than ever.

Hope this is useful to someone.

Edited by Timboj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello , it is my first post on this forum ,

I want show my scores benchmark what was did by core2duo 2,2GHz with gf 8600m 512MB ddr2 for my last 3 drivers what I use:

driver - 3dmrk01 3dmrk03 3dmrk05 3dmrk06

174.35 - 21107 - 10519 - 6421 - 3610

177.39 - 21127 - 10567 - 6450 - 3645

177.41 - 21519 - 10594 - 6444 - 3641

So for me 177.39 was better .. for dx9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This release (and probably all 177.xx releases, I haven't tried the others) seems to have the old 8800M GTX underclocking issue back! My 8800 permanently runs at 275MHz core/301MHz memory... (Don't tell me it's powermizer, it's a bug that was present in a whole run of drivers through 167/169/174/175 series' and was fixed.)

Edited by Phnx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This release (and probably all 177.xx releases, I haven't tried the others) seems to have the old 8800M GTX underclocking issue back! My 8800 permanently runs at 275MHz core/301MHz memory... (Don't tell me it's powermizer, it's a bug that was present in a whole run of drivers through 167/169/174/175 series' and was fixed.)

Sry but i have to say that it is really the powermizer. my 8600gt had the same problem an after a bunch of tweaking the powermizer settings in the registry i got my old clocks back and they switch correct between ac and battery mode and ofcourse the few energy saving profiles of asus.

if you want to know how i changed the setting in the registry, send me an pn then i will send you an screenshot of my settings :)

mfg Agressor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this driver are fantastic with Mass effect....with before driver i always crash...

i have an hp pavilion dv6560el

intel core 2 duo t7300 2ghz

8400m gs 128mb ddr2

default clock: 400/400/800

OC modding bios: 600/514/1200

3dmark06= 2100

i now wait for driver that take physx work my 8400m gs :) :):D:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This driver constantly crashes on my 9800GTX KO [desktop]. I get a lot of in game artifacts in COD4. I'll have to go back to a non-PhysX driver since this seems to be the case with all off them.

This driver seems to be working fine for my 8800M GTS on my laptop. But PhysX is not enabled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Excelent drivers, recomend these for the people using 8600GT. Got a score of 4407 on 3DMark06 with MacBook Pro

3dmark06zu3.th.jpg

MacBook Pro 15" Glossy | 2.5GHz Penryn | 4GB Ram | 8600GT 512MB | 200GB 7200RPM HDD

Hey,

Can you tell me what you use to OC? I've been using atitool on my 2.4Ghz Macbook Pro but with an 177 driver it blackscreens and I have to restart.

Cheers from New Zealand.

Tau

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...