Guest lax01 Posted October 23, 2003 Report Share Posted October 23, 2003 45.24 vs 52.16 - [Clock Speeds -270/555] - Normal Operation Level 45.24 - 5662 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7144328 52.16 - 5380 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7144429 Tried to keep everything constant. Notice I am overclocked quite a bit. 52.16 suck. I am going back the 45.xx series. _______________________________________________________ System Configurations My System Compared System Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows XP DirectX Version: 9.0 9.0 Mobo Manufacturer: Dell Computer Dell Computer Corporation Mobo Model: Inspiron 8200 Inspiron 8200 AGP Rates (Current/Available): 4x / 1x 2x 4x 4x / 1x 2x 4x CPU: Intel Pentium 4 1694 MHz Intel Pentium 4 1694 MHz FSB: 256 MHz 256 MHz Memory: 512 MB 512 MB Graphics Chipset: NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go Driver Version: 6.14.10.4524 6.14.10.5216 Video Memory: 64 MB 64 MB Program Version: 3DMark2001 SE 3DMark2001 SE Resolution: 1024x768 32bit 1024x768 32bit Texture Format: Compressed Compressed FSAA: Disabled Disabled Z-Buffer Depth: 24bit 24bit Frame Buffer: Double Double Rendering Pipeline: D3D Pure Hardware T&L D3D Hardware T&L Detailed Test Results 3DMark Score (3D marks): 5662 5380 Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail (FPS) 104.7 102.9 Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail (FPS) 34.9 31.1 Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail (FPS) 107.2 98.5 Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail (FPS) 48.6 45.6 Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail (FPS) 99.0 97.9 Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail (FPS) 44.1 42.6 Game 4 - Nature (FPS) No hardware support No hardware support Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) (MTexels/s) 532.2 532.2 Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) (MTexels/s) 1014.3 1014.3 High Polygon Count (1 light) (MTriangels/s) 30.4 30.2 High Polygon Count (8 lights) (MTriangels/s) 6.5 6.4 Environment Bump Mapping (FPS) No hardware support No hardware support DOT3 Bump Mapping (FPS) 80.9 80.8 Vertex Shader (FPS) 33.1 41.3 Pixel Shader (FPS) No hardware support No hardware support Advanced Pixel Shader (FPS) No hardware support No hardware support Point Sprite Speed (MSprites/s) 12.1 12.1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 25, 2003 Report Share Posted October 25, 2003 Hey, because I've noticed that you have a Inspiron8200, I am wondering, if those versions of the DET's you used, are compatible with the Ultrasharp TFT @1600x1200. Is that 45.24 working with it? I have an GF440 GO 32mb, and the last one working was 43.45. Manufacturer code of the TFT is SEC (Sandra interprets that as SeikoEpson). I have now read, that there are Sharp and Samsung, with the Samsung making more problems. Is that SEC a Samsung? Thank you! Don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobilenvidia Posted October 25, 2003 Report Share Posted October 25, 2003 Don, Good news and Bad news, Good news- you can get to 1600x1200 with 52.16 now the bad news the only other resolution is 640x480. Good to know that 43.45 also works with Samsung (SEC in Sandra) Ultra Sharp UXGA screens. There is a very odd EDID problem with the Samsung Panel. It is either read wrong or misinterpreted. Either way only a very few drivers work. I wouldn't getting hold of a Samsung US UXGA and having a play with it. I reckon it is fixable. A job for later. Pieter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lax01 Posted October 25, 2003 Report Share Posted October 25, 2003 I guess I don't have the Samsung panel becuase mine has about 10 different resolutions you can set it to. I have never had a problem with the UXGA panel. I would call Dell and tell them to give you a refurbsihed Sharp panel... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 25, 2003 Report Share Posted October 25, 2003 Thx for the input. Maybe I will try the 52s out someday, when I'll do a fresh install. Only 1600? Hm, I play all my games in native res, cannot stand that interpolation on a tft. Mate, how come they didn't use a function to extrapolate 800x600 by the factor 2 and NOT use that filtering? That would use 4 px for its origin... You would have a REAL solid 800x600 you could use for the newer games, which you would not even dare to set to 1600. hehe Now that's a pity, but I realize it's a function of the monitor itself, and Nvidia can not do a thing about it... well then, cu Don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lax01 Posted October 25, 2003 Report Share Posted October 25, 2003 Pieter: Want to add me to the bencmark list? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tbblizzard Posted October 26, 2003 Report Share Posted October 26, 2003 lax01 - I have almost the same setup as you and I am not hitting close to your 3D Mark scores... Dell Inspiron 8200 1.6Ghz P4 1Gb RAM GeForce4 440 Go 64MB My average scoring was high 4,000's with 3DM2001 (this is not overclocking) and on 3DM2003 it was low 500's. I can't figure out why my systems video performance runs so slow and I'm wondering if overclocking will be a solution to this problem. Any suggestions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobilenvidia Posted October 26, 2003 Report Share Posted October 26, 2003 Lax01, What's your results without overclocking, I'll add those to the list. Best keep it fair on the rest, and any one with same video can see what the speed should be. Tbblizzard, hopefully unoverclocked figures from Lax01 will answer your question. Also make sure that every thing in the display properties are set to max and that nView is set to Single Display. Pieter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lax01 Posted October 26, 2003 Report Share Posted October 26, 2003 Pieter, I will have to do more tests without over-clocking but I don't know when I will do that. tbblizzard: How many processes do you have running? Do you have any extra background programs running? I have my card overclocked quite a bit and I leave it running 24/7 with absolutely no stability problems. I would try over-clocking a little bit and see if your scores come up a little. I know mine did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2003 Report Share Posted December 2, 2003 EngineNoO9 here from Dell forum... here's my scores... :) best I seen around for a 440 go for 2001 Benchmark 3dmark 2001se score 5715: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5999339 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2003 Report Share Posted December 2, 2003 enginenoo9 still here... addition to my above post... best for a 440 go in a i8200... last I checked that is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 10, 2003 Report Share Posted December 10, 2003 What is a good overclock for a dell Lattitude c840 Geforce 440 go? RAM and GPU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 EngineNoO9, just compared my score (4944) with yours and although you beat me overall, there are certain areas where I out perform you. I'm o/c core 270, mem 555. Using 53.03 drivers from MadToast and dx 9b. I guess your drivers must be much faster. Mateus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Copper Top Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Just did my dell c840 2.2, 64 nvidia, 1gig ram, 5400 rpm drive. Over Clock @ 275 and 550 Score 6194, this so far is the best i got useing 44.68, is there another that might work better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobilenvidia Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Copper Top try using 44.03 or 44.10. Energizer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 8, 2004 Report Share Posted February 8, 2004 hey guys, I've tried a lot of drivers for a 440go, and I'm telling you, if you could dig up some old 40's, you'd be faster. I was running around 274/475 I believe and I pulled this one out http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5539889 I know that pieter doesn't want to publish cause it's overclocked, but just to give you an idea, I tried the 44's, and I liked the 40's. 5875 is one heck of a score for a 32mb 440! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pesticide Posted February 24, 2004 Report Share Posted February 24, 2004 Heya any of you guys have a 8100 ? i got a gf4 440 go thx to my uncle who has a 8200 and dell shipped a gf4go later on due to they only gave him a gf2 while he ordered a gf4 but he doesnt need it so i was able to use it and update my gf2 :) i get around 4000 points Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.