Jump to content
LaptopVideo2Go Forums

Benchmark results for NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 512


zipper

Recommended Posts

And then 177.66 - pretty fast on newer stuff, but something wrong with CP - couldn't get the 3D settings to open.

Correction - it took ages to load.

Overclocking works after second reboot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • zipper

    188

  • Dox

    11

  • Killu

    8

  • bruno2040

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

177.72 - fastest on 3DMark06. But: No CP; DX10 lost and doesn't come back even when reinstalling the newest redistributable. And of course Vantage doesn't start, complaining missing DX10 .

So rolled back to 177.40 and everything works again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.73 - the overall fastest on 3DMark03 and 06. But same problems - no DX10, no CP. Very odd behaviour with my card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now tried with original INF - and CP + DX10 work; so the modified INF is bugged. Speed on benchmarks is top level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reinstalled with fixed modded INF. DX10 works now, but no CP. Similar good results. Overclocks well,too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.79 with fixed modified INF - still no CP. But the fastest so far on 3DMark06 and Vantage.

...fixed still once and reinstalled, now CP works and benchies are first rate. 3dMark03 also fastest now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.79 with enabled PhysX gave about 100 points more on 3DMark Vantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.83 a little slower; no CP with modified INF (with nvcod133.dll)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.89 tried, about the same as .83 and behaves similarly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Step backward with 176.26, Fujitsu-S. Crap as they have been, no overclocking. Bad performance on 3DMark06 and Vantage. CP works yet. No PhysX of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.85 tried with original INF; no quirks. Fastest on Vantage, but older benchies not too good. OC and CP OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You probably have less processes running - or faster processor - or some mystic in there. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.92 tried - nothing special speedwise; no CP with modded INF. 177.79 still the top benchmarker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.92 failed to install with latest INF - so back to 177.85 with original INF. And with cleaned system the benchmarks are absolute top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Fougere

My "old" 177.40 works fine.

CP available, overclocked to 15% faster with Riva Tuner 2.10.

The complete manual related to the 8710w is here

Useful to clean the laptop (see the section "Component replacement procedures") and many others things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.92 failed to install with latest INF - so back to 177.85 with original INF. And with cleaned system the benchmarks are absolute top.

Guys, where can I download the latest drivers from? The Nvidia site won't let me as it tells you to go via HP who don't have any newer drivers. I'm currently on 174.70 and getting some really bad bugging in World of Warcraft. Any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, where can I download the latest drivers from? The Nvidia site won't let me as it tells you to go via HP who don't have any newer drivers. I'm currently on 174.70 and getting some really bad bugging in World of Warcraft. Any ideas?

I'm a noob - spotted the downloads section on this site. The 177.40 download doesn't mention support for FX1600M though - is that the right one to try?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a noob - spotted the downloads section on this site. The 177.40 download doesn't mention support for FX1600M though - is that the right one to try?

I'm still a noob! Found the modified .inf details which include FX1600M. I'll shut up now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

177.98 tried - about as fast as 177.85 and nothing to complain. Worth trying!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

178.13 tried using have disk, especially fast on 3DMark03 and 5, no problems found. One of the fastest overall. Results to come later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now added to the table - impressive how the older benchmarks still get better figures!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

179.13 tried, no problems. About as fast as 178.13 - a couple of points faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

179.13 works well on my Dell precision 6300.

Overclocks and CP.

3DMark06 : 5300

5846 with RivaTuner 715/1442/874

5908 with RivaTuner 715/1442/912 but Crysis freezes

Crysis Benchmark GPU : 38 fps with 1280x800, no aliasing and RivaTuner 715/1442/874

27 fps with 1490x900, no aliasing and RivaTuner 715/1442/874

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

178.26 quadro driver: the fastest so far on Vantage and overall among the fastest. No quirks found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...