cojy Posted January 8, 2008 Report Share Posted January 8, 2008 (edited) Hi guys, just wanted to share it with you, here are the latest benchs i did with my 8700m GT on the toshiba X200 for those who can't see the picture : 6337pts (SM 2.0 : 2830, SM 3.0 : 2695, CPU : 1728) Here is the best stock score I've had : I'm using the 169.25 whql drivers with the modded inf found in this site. Frequency were the following : 748Mhz for the core and 1022Mhz for the memory. The temperature went up to 60°C I oc it with ntune in the nvidia control panel. Waiting for you to beat me :) Cojy Edited January 8, 2008 by cojy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted January 8, 2008 Report Share Posted January 8, 2008 Waiting for you to beat me :) As long as you are using xxxx x 900 resolution it's hard to compare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cojy Posted January 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2008 It's native resolution of the 3dmark06 free version so 1280*854 as far as I'm concerned... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 It's native resolution of the 3dmark06 free version so 1280*854 as far as I'm concerned... Well, have to try with my "brother" Quadro 1600M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Ok, you beat me; "just" 6299 with 778/982 clocks, about the maximum I can use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 6336 with 174.13. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cojy Posted February 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2008 Hi, I've been trying to unlink the core and shaders clock. So, going up to 756/1552 for core/shader and 1025 as far as mem is concerned, I've obtained 6402 pts SM2.0 : 2905 SM3.0 : 2732 and cpu : 1686. I used the 171.16 drivers and temperature did not get higher than 65°C. Cojy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ghostrider Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Hi, I don't understand when I can't do same overclocks. I have a x200-21e. When I overclock to 700MHz for core and 800MHz for memory, my score is approximatly 5200pts in 3D Mark 06 and when I play a game like Crysis, Bioshock or Call Of Duty 4 my graphiq card crash and I must to restart the laptop to reload defaut settings. Anyone have an idea? (sorry to my english) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mst8ken Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 Hi guys, just wanted to share it with you, here are the latest benchs i did with my 8700m GT on the toshiba X200 for those who can't see the picture : 6337pts (SM 2.0 : 2830, SM 3.0 : 2695, CPU : 1728) Here is the best stock score I've had : I'm using the 169.25 whql drivers with the modded inf found in this site. Frequency were the following : 748Mhz for the core and 1022Mhz for the memory. The temperature went up to 60°C I oc it with ntune in the nvidia control panel. Waiting for you to beat me :) Cojy Dude, just wanting to know which version of windows are you running and how many megs of ram as well. is your x200 a stock? Im currently using the x205 and getting less than 5k scores....any help would be greatly appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cojy Posted April 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 (edited) Dude, just wanting to know which version of windows are you running and how many megs of ram as well.is your x200 a stock? Im currently using the x205 and getting less than 5k scores....any help would be greatly appreciated. Hi I finally reached the 7000 pts ! The benchs i did were under xp, but the last one was under vista with the drivers 174.74 I haven't change anything in my laptop so i'm running with 2Go Ram at 667Mhz, a 2Ghz proc and a 8700m 256Mo. 7062 pts with the frequencies of 756/1853/1025 (core/shader/mem) SM2.0 : 3266, SM3.0 : 3061 and proc : 1756. Without any oc, i get 5422 pts which is pretty good compared to the 4800 pts with the toshiba drivers ! Cojy Edited May 6, 2008 by cojy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackTR Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 He cojy, I've got a X200 and I've never came above 5000 with no OC. So tell me, are you running the tests in 1024x768? Which OS are you running? Any last known tricks? I've tried many drivers, except the 174.74. The 174.60 gave my card to much heat and my lappie shutted down many times, because of overheating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dozzen Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 (edited) Hi I finally reached the 7000 pts ! The benchs i did were under xp, but the last one was under vista with the drivers 174.74I haven't change anything in my laptop so i'm running with 2Go Ram at 667Mhz, a 2Ghz proc and a 8700m 256Mo. 7062 pts with the frequencies of 756/853/1025 (core/shader/mem) SM2.0 : 3266, SM3.0 : 3061 and proc : 1756. Without any oc, i get 5422 pts which is pretty good compared to the 4800 pts with the toshiba drivers ! Cojy Ok a couple of comments: 1. The native 3dmark06 resolution is 1280x1024, so basically all of these benchmark scores are overvalued. 2. The DEFAULT shader clock of the 8700m GT is 1250Mhz, so you're trying to tell me that you set your record breaking score, by downclocking to 853?? Dont think so. I hate to ruin your parade, but dont give out false information, which might confuse newer users. Edited April 30, 2008 by dozzen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cojy Posted May 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 (edited) Ok a couple of comments:1. The native 3dmark06 resolution is 1280x1024, so basically all of these benchmark scores are overvalued. 2. The DEFAULT shader clock of the 8700m GT is 1250Mhz, so you're trying to tell me that you set your record breaking score, by downclocking to 853?? Dont think so. I hate to ruin your parade, but dont give out false information, which might confuse newer users. Ok sorry I forgot the 1 before 853, it's 1853Mhz. Score is not overvalued, it's juste the score at the native resolution of 3Dmark, not everybody want to crack the soft. If you want a reference in scores, it's not possible to compare between someone running in 1024x768 against someone under 1920*1600 ! the same card won't do the same score so it would be stupid. Here is the picture i took with the oc : http://www.hiboox.com/lang-fr/image.php?img=ukjfypec.jpg Anyway, I have already gotten the pb of the perf stuck under 5K pointsa and the only solution I found was to boot under xp and then come back to vista...otherwise, no matter what oc i did i always get the same score around 4200pts when the basic score should be around 5200pts. Edited May 6, 2008 by cojy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest d.vader Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 Native resolution for 3DMark06 is 1280x1024(free version). Are you telling us, that you got 7000 at that resolution-don't think so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cojy Posted May 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 Native resolution for 3DMark06 is 1280x1024(free version).Are you telling us, that you got 7000 at that resolution-don't think so... Yes I'm telling that, resolution was 1280*800 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 Wow, could get my Quadro 1600M just to do 6770 before the driver coughed, probably my shader does much less, just about 1730. (same resolution) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest oprych Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 Yes I'm telling that, resolution was 1280*800 Then next time add resolution to your score in 3DMark06, because 1280x800 isn't native resolution for this benchmark! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Then next time add resolution to your score in 3DMark06, because 1280x800 isn't native resolution for this benchmark! ...and on my monitor doesn't even show the fps counter... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cojy Posted May 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 (edited) Then next time add resolution to your score in 3DMark06, because 1280x800 isn't native resolution for this benchmark! Ok i'm waiting for you to buy a license to every person who wants to compare his result Edited May 8, 2008 by cojy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodfreyOuwens Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 (edited) XPS M1730 dual 8700M Gt's in SLI, stock drivers, No OC, no tweaks set res to 1280x800 funny thing is... my score is higher when i OC the cards and run at 3dmark native res of 1280 x 1024 If you want, I could disable SLI and run the benchmark with 1 card and at your res of 1280x800.. Edited May 11, 2008 by GodfreyOuwens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.