Jump to content
LaptopVideo2Go Forums

Benchmark results for NVIDIA GeForce 8600M-GT (Hoffa)


Hoffa

Recommended Posts

i'm still don't know why, it's beacause hardware or software problems? if that software problem, perhaps form the VGA drivers itself, maybe it's not compatible or suitable for my card

Now i use 180.70,

What is your room temp? Some people live in tropical country and some live in sub-tropical. For me, my temp never goes above 80. Average in gaming is 76C. I live in a very hot country but I play in a conditioned room (25C says my AC).

So check your room temp. 90+ I think quite unhealthy for your lappy. It may not damage your card instantly. But it'll for sure reduce its lifetime. Also all component nearby (i.e. battery) can be affected as well.

Note: driver will have minimum effect on your GPU temp. In my case, max 5C diff.

Edited by melon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hoffa

    10

  • Pelmeshik

    8

  • meruyantoro

    6

  • nightwolf314

    5

What is your room temp? Some people live in tropical country and some live in sub-tropical. For me, my temp never goes above 80. Average in gaming is 76C. I live in a very hot country but I play in a conditioned room (25C says my AC).

So check your room temp. 90+ I think quite unhealthy for your lappy. It may not damage your card instantly. But it'll for sure reduce its lifetime. Also all component nearby (i.e. battery) can be affected as well.

Note: driver will have minimum effect on your GPU temp. In my case, max 5C diff.

we have same country, and play only in a conditioned room with NB Cooling pad, but it's not help. Yesterday after play crysis about 4 hours, my temp goes 101C (thats my temp record), I used 180.70 driver without overclock. Some people said in this forum that i must go back to older driver, like 169.xx. Is that true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's trial and error, every driver behaves a little different. Underclocking is also a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i tried dox 180.70 game crashes all the time with or without overclocking,ive tested a lot of drivers and 178.13 is the best so far

Do you guys use Windows XP? I have Dox 180.84 now, but I can't run GTA IV on a higher resolution than 1024x768 at all.

Or is 180.84 certainly better than 178.13?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you guys use Windows XP? I have Dox 180.84 now, but I can't run GTA IV on a higher resolution than 1024x768 at all.

Or is 180.84 certainly better than 178.13?

Probably, but there are different experiences. 8600M GT isn't upto the task for bigger resolutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not, I can run every new game on at least 1280x800, so it anoys me that GTA IV can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Love those results.

Im running a zepto 6324w Intel T7250, 2.0 ghz, 4gb ram and a 8600m GT 512 mb on WinXP x64. Very much the same as you, however, using the newest standard driver from the nvidia.com site, I get only around 8k in 3DMark03.

Can anybody guide me to get some improvements?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

512 DDR2 T7700 CPU

625/1250/482 OC

3Dmark06 Benchmark Resolution 1280x800 on Dox's 180.70 driver

Score: 4601

I changed my OS to Vista x64 so the test is on Vista

Edited by jacktheripper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
512 DDR2 T7700 CPU

625/1250/482 OC

3Dmark06 Benchmark Resolution 1280x800 on Dox's 180.70 driver

Score: 4601

I changed my OS to Vista x64 so the test is on Vista

wow, that's high.

what's ur NB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4913 on system that is on the left :)

post-29290-1231956782_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everybody, as the current driver for this card that nvidia offers on their homepage is the 179.28 I wondered if anybody knows whether it is worth to upgrade to a later driver? I'm using that one, slightly overclocked with Riva. Is it promising to upgrade to the 18x series to get significant improvement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everybody, as the current driver for this card that nvidia offers on their homepage is the 179.28 I wondered if anybody knows whether it is worth to upgrade to a later driver? I'm using that one, slightly overclocked with Riva. Is it promising to upgrade to the 18x series to get significant improvement?

You may run 3D Mark 06 to see the results and than try Dox`s Optomised 181.20

http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/index....showtopic=22670

and share the results "before and after" with us :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may run 3D Mark 06 to see the results and than try Dox`s Optomised 181.20

http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/index....showtopic=22670

and share the results "before and after" with us :)

Yeah, I was planning to do that.

However, let me ask one stupid question - sorry in advance. In on of the tutorials it's been stated to uninstall your current driver before installing another one.

... Hmm, how does my 8600m gt work in the meantime while no driver is installed? Is it running in default vga mode or something? Sound like changing my tyres while driving... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Hmm, how does my 8600m gt work in the meantime while no driver is installed? Is it running in default vga mode or something? Sound like changing my tyres while driving... :)

Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

Okay, here are my figures with 3DMark06:

Each configuration tested at least three times, numbers are average of these runs.

179.28 (as provided by Nvidia):

3DMarkScore: 4253

SM 2.0: 1711

SM 3.0: 1576

185.20 (from here):

3DMarkScore: 4225

SM 2.0: 1716

SM 3.0: 1551

181.20 Dox opt:

3DMarkScore: 4009

SM 2.0: 1612

SM 3.0: 1465

So, consequently I rolled back to 179.28.

The Dox opt is in my case a definite no-go.

And the restore from sleep doesn't work with either modded ones.

BTW my specs are Vista 32 bit, Acer Aspire 5920, 2,4 Ghz, 8600m GT, 512 VRam, 3GB Ram

GPU clock set to 540/1080 Mhz.

Greetz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Computer configuration :

-Acer Aspire 5920G

-Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 2,0GHz

-2Gb DDR2 RAM

-NVIDIA GeForce 8600M-GT 512Mb DDR2

-OS : Windows Vista 32-Bit/Windows XP Pro 32-Bit

Soft & Driver Info :

Tool used : RivaTuner

Tool version : v2.06

Default clock : 475/900/400

Comparison table :

Drivers......................................OC Speed..........................................3DMark06 at 1024x768

v169.04.....................................609/1218/475.....................................4746 3DMarks

v171.16.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4895 3DMarks

v171.16.....................................650/1300/482.....................................4967 3DMarks

Drivers......................................OC Speed..........................................3DMark06

v169.04.....................................No Overclock.....................................3543 3DMarks

v169.28.....................................No Overclock.....................................3549 3DMarks

v171.16.....................................No Overclock.....................................3559 3DMarks

v169.21.....................................No Overclock.....................................3794 3DMarks (Using Windows XP)

v169.61.....................................No Overclock.....................................3794 3DMarks (Using Windows XP)

v171.16.....................................No Overclock.....................................3820 3DMarks (Using Windows XP)

v169.04.....................................609/1218/479.....................................4246 3DMarks

v167.55.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4339 3DMarks

v169.28.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4356 3DMarks

v169.28.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4357 3DMarks (Using 1900MB ReadyBoost)

v169.04.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4373 3DMarks

v169.04.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4383 3DMarks (Using 1GB ReadyBoost)

v171.16.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4393 3DMarks

v171.16.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4408 3DMarks (Using 1900MB ReadyBoost)

v169.28.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4605 3DMarks (Using Windows XP)

v171.16.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4622 3DMarks (Using Windows XP)

v171.16.....................................625/1250/482.....................................4628 3DMarks (Using Windows XP)

Drivers......................................OC Speed..........................................3DMark03

v169.04.....................................609/1218/479.....................................12691 3DMarks

v171.16.....................................625/1250/482.....................................12951 3DMarks

Conclusion :

The 171.16 Drivers are the best drivers for Overclocking so far.

Notes :

The 169.04 Drivers are really good. They can be O/C'd, and have a very good gaming performance, like you can see.

I'll try to go up to 4500 3DMarks in default, by Overclocking my laptop to the limits.

All right, i tried the 169.09 Drivers, they are absolutely horrible, can't even OC it ! I started 3DMark, ans saw that my FPS was like 7 at the beginning, with the .04, i got 27 !

Tried the .02, they suck too. Still searching...

18/01/08:

Just downloaded the 171.16 Drivers, and guess what ? Damn they rock ! Can be Overclocked too, and got 10 more 3DMarks ! Yeehaah ! :)

And now, tested with ReadyBoost, and it boosted up my scores with 15 points ! Yey, broke the 4400+ line :P

19/01/08:

Went back to the 169.28 Drivers to test them. Can be Overclocked, but they suck. -51 3DMarks compared to 171.16 :unsure:

Tryed the Drivers .28 with and without ReadyBoost, the score changed only by one.... No comment. PS: I'm going back to 171.16 !

I'm updating this thread all the time to find the best available drivers for Overclocking, so come back soon for new updates.

For any questions, i'm here :w00t:

PS: I love that banana guy dancing :)

I'm sorry, but how can you make a comparison between tests done on the different drivers, while some are overclocked one way, some are overclocked the other way and some arn't even overclocked..

How about you make one part for no overclocking at all, post results, then one with a certain overclock etc?..

>.<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...