Guest kallogan Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 Well, So i've done a few overclocking tests, and results are quite surprising. 179.28 nvidia driver. 660/1650/900 : 5999 points 670/1675/900 : 6100 points 625/1550/900 : 6480 points (!!!!) Temps never go above 80 degres while gaming. I'm 77°C max with 625/1550/900. I've tried to keep 2,5 multiplicator between core and shaders. But we saw that with 9700M GT clocks the score is far better. I'm suprised by that observation, moderate overclocking seems to be more efficient. So, 9600M GT users, did you have similar results during overclocking tests ????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kallogan Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 Well, So i've done a few overclocking tests, and results are quite surprising.179.28 nvidia driver. 660/1650/900 : 5999 points 670/1675/900 : 6100 points 625/1550/900 : 6480 points (!!!!) Temps never go above 80 degres while gaming. I'm 77°C max with 625/1550/900. I've tried to keep 2,5 multiplicator between core and shaders. But we saw that with 9700M GT clocks the score is far better. I'm suprised by that observation, moderate overclocking seems to be more efficient. So, 9600M GT users, did you have similar results during overclocking tests ????? erf I just remember that i've installed last PhysX version a few days ago maybe that's why....big improvment if i'm right. 635/1575/900 : 6551 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daws Posted January 21, 2009 Report Share Posted January 21, 2009 erf I just remember that i've installed last PhysX version a few days ago maybe that's why....big improvment if i'm right.635/1575/900 : 6551 What kind of laptop do you have? And how about the temps, now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.