Nautis1100 Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Another day another driver. This time beta drivers found at NVIDIA. 191.03 Win7\Vista 32-bit 191.03 Win7\Vista 64-bit 191.03 WinXP 32-bit 191.03 WinXP 64-bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brain86 Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 i found these half an hour ago :) ... but i cant install these. i tried the modded inf from 191.00. i says "your system hasnt been modified :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest urraca Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 how can i install this ? , thanks :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nautis1100 Posted September 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 The latest INF Pieter released that most closely resembles the INF in 191.03 seems to be the one for 190.64. I suggest downloading the 190.64 modified INF and changing the following line to change the version to correctly identify as 191.03: DriverVer = 08/26/2009, 8.16.11.9064 To DriverVer = 09/19/2009, 8.16.11.9103 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Any benchmarks yet? Or is it just a minor update from the 191.00... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelw1ng Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 The latest INF Pieter released that most closely resembles the INF in 191.03 seems to be the one for 190.64. I suggest downloading the 190.64 modified INF and changing the following line to change the version to correctly identify as 191.03: DriverVer = 08/26/2009, 8.16.11.9064 To DriverVer = 09/19/2009, 8.16.11.9103 You don't think that the 191.00 .inf would work just as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nautis1100 Posted September 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 You don't think that the 191.00 .inf would work just as well? Yeah the 191.00 modified INF should work fine but Pieter released only the 64bit version before he left. Edit: I modified a couple 191.03 INFs for both Vista/Win7 64/32bit while I was bored, based on Pieters. 32bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) 64bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crucial Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Yeah the 191.00 modified INF should work fine but Pieter released only the 64bit version before he left. Edit: I modified a couple 191.03 INFs for both Vista/Win7 64/32bit while I was bored, based on Pieters. 32bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) 64bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) now I have a Geforce 7900 GS would this driver work on mine? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porsche Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Yeah the 191.00 modified INF should work fine but Pieter released only the 64bit version before he left. Edit: I modified a couple 191.03 INFs for both Vista/Win7 64/32bit while I was bored, based on Pieters. 32bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) 64bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) thank you...working well with a 8600m gt ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Any idea how these stack up against 186.82? Those have been the best drivers for my 9800m GS so far, especially when it comes to overclocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spax87 Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 interesting. i´ll give them a try :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
errol Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 would this driver work with my sony vaio on a 8400m gt gpu graphic card pls ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest g60force Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I would strongly suggest to wait for Pieter's modded INF because I used EximDiff (freeware) 1.8 to compare the suggested 191.03 with 190.64 and there are SO FRIGGIN many differences! this one could become very unstable and the differences are offcourse not only the added cardmodels :) PS.: It would be cool to learn fro Pieter guess I'll be studying his next INF and see what changes he makes :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvalencia Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 (edited) For the most part, it works with my Geforce 9500M GS 512MB VRAM. Compared to 179.88(ASUS), it creates repeated click sounds when I use with USB based sound cards e.g. Logitech USB speakers, USB C-Media AC97. It seems OK with my built-in RealTek HDA (ALC888S). I use Windows 7 Ultimate X64. Edited September 27, 2009 by rvalencia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nautis1100 Posted September 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I would strongly suggest to wait for Pieter's modded INF because I used EximDiff (freeware) 1.8 to compare the suggested 191.03 with 190.64 and there are SO FRIGGIN many differences! this one could become very unstable and the differences are offcourse not only the added cardmodels :) PS.: It would be cool to learn fro Pieter guess I'll be studying his next INF and see what changes he makes :) This should be the case for most drivers. If you have a compare tool you should be able to figure out the critical differences by comparing a few modified INFs vs the originals. Most INFs that come in the official drivers are optimized to the specific chipsets listed, what a modified INF like Pieters does is take the middleground and removes all the noncritical chipset specific optimizations and adds as many chipsets to the mix as possible. The dirty little secret is modding isn't very difficult and if you have a comparison tool and can pay attention you are at least half way there. Remember modding a driver for yourself is much different than making an INF that includes almost all known chipsets though. In the case of the INFs I posted they should work fine, its not about matching the INF released its about starting with a working base and changing any critical differences. As far as I can tell the 191 series hasn't changed or added any critical settings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spark99 Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Nautis1100's Modded INF's seem to be working fine on my Windows 7 (x64) RTM and Server 2008 R2 (x64) RTM Builds. These Drivers seem very Stable and my Rig stays Cool. I am about to Install & Test a bunch of Games !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamika007z Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 I'm interested to see if the DPC Latency issue has been addressed with this driver. Taken directly from their site: "•Includes numerous bug fixes, including the following key fix (additional bug fixes can be found in the release notes on the documentation tab): For graphics cards supporting multiple clock states, 3D clocks correctly return to 2D clocks after exiting a 3D application." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rolloLG Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Yeah the 191.00 modified INF should work fine but Pieter released only the 64bit version before he left. Edit: I modified a couple 191.03 INFs for both Vista/Win7 64/32bit while I was bored, based on Pieters. 32bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) 64bit Vista/Win7 Modified INF (Right click & save as) Thanks a lot! I can finally use a modern driver with my GF9600M GT that has no serious bugs!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 : For graphics cards supporting multiple clock states, 3D clocks correctly return to 2D clocks after exiting a 3D application." Phew - could I finally get my powermizer to work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
painkiller Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 (edited) DPC Latency issue solved but WEI (seven x86) :) not solved for me in seven x64 xps-m1530 8600m gt modded inf Edited September 28, 2009 by painkiller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Yay, PowerMizer is working at last - but performance is mediocre :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Yay, PowerMizer is working at last - but performance is mediocre :) How so? I'd like to know which driver you were using before 191.03. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 How so? I'd like to know which driver you were using before 191.03. Well, quite a few.. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
painkiller Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 in seven x64 the dpc latency is here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelw1ng Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Interestingly, Disk Usage monitoring (using System Tools 6.05) no longer works, although every other pane seems to be functioning. I don't know enough to blame this on the driver or my bootstrapped 191.00 .inf usage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.