Guest juan0x Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 Thanks for your help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo64 Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 Can you be more vague? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest juan0x Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 Im using the driver win 7 automaticly installs. What more information do you need? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacktheripper Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 (edited) If you're asking for help, tell us what kind of card it is. But seeing as it is in IDT Sigmatel thread, use the latest drivers! And since you're not using x64 OS, you can even try the latest modded drivers which you don't have to deal with annoying driver signing. Edited May 11, 2010 by jacktheripper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Marley Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 If you're asking for help, tell us what kind of card it is. But seeing as it is in IDT Sigmatel thread, use the latest drivers! And since you're not using x64 OS, you can even try the latest modded drivers which you don't have to deal with annoying driver signing. x64 users can used non-WHQL drivers, as long as the .sys files themselves are signed. All of the IDT drivers do have the .sys file signed, so even if you mod the INF you can still install it on an x64 system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo64 Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 (edited) x64 users can used non-WHQL drivers, as long as the .sys files themselves are signed. All of the IDT drivers do have the .sys file signed, so even if you mod the INF you can still install it on an x64 system. Good info 2 know, thanks What if the .cat file signs the dll/sys files but just not the .inf does that still count? Edited May 11, 2010 by ricktendo64 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Marley Posted May 12, 2010 Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 If I am correct, the .cat file is only related to WHQL approval and not to the actual signing of the driver files. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.