Jump to content
LaptopVideo2Go Forums

Benchmark results for NVIDIA GeForce GTX1080(laptop)


zipper

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • mobilenvidia

    1

  • zipper

    47

  • StefanG3D

    4

  • CptCruiseCtrl

    1

At last had time to try 440.97 WHQL. Not much has changed, perhaps a little up from the worst figures of predecessors. Must realize this is the level now, nothing better to be expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long time gone, another weak driver. 441.37 WHQL all figures down a little. Not impressive for 1.xxx cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over a month gone - 441.66 tried with a little better results. But not as fast as 430.97 for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New year - new driver, 442.01 hotfix. Pretty similar, a little down and a little up. Nothing impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A month later 442.50 WHQL, perhaps a tad faster than 441.xx but pretty similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now 445.78 hotfix driver - not better except 3DMark 11 a little up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

445.87 about the same, two tests slightly down, two up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

445.98 hotfix is pretty similar. Tried OC on TimeSpy, had to lower settings as crashed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

446.14 WHQL tried - about the same, nothing special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

451.48 now - some numbers slightly up, some down. Nothing special to mention. Didn't get the latest Win10 update yet, it might give some boost - or not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, zipper said:

451.48 now - some numbers slightly up, some down. Nothing special to mention. Didn't get the latest Win10 update yet, it might give some boost - or not...

Try with and without "Hardware Accelerated GPU Scheduling"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it needs version 2004, not yet offered for my hw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Now tried - what an update! Time Spy dropped from 6876 to 4736 and stutters continually. That's - 31.1 %. Congrats to MS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zipper said:

Now tried - what an update! Time Spy dropped from 6876 to 4736 and stutters continually. That's - 31.1 %. Congrats to MS!!!

Interesting, as I am getting a better Time Spy score with this latest driver.  Went from 7466 to 7546.  Also gained 2 fps in RDR2 Benchmark, but lost 5 fps in Borderlands 3 benchmark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps some teething problems - lets see with the next driver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zipper said:

Now tried - what an update! Time Spy dropped from 6876 to 4736 and stutters continually. That's - 31.1 %. Congrats to MS!!!

I didn't compare for a long time, but i have the same discrepancy

https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/3356392/spy/12919024#

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now 451.85 and Hardware Accelerated GPU Scheduling"  - killing 3DMark 11 Performance. Actually Tims Spy got 1% boost compared to without, other tests were pretty same. So about no benefit but the jerks didn't occur anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

452.06 WHQL tried. A little down except FS Ultra surprisingly up by 1%  ...well, not too significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

456.55 tried. About the same performance; FS Ultra back again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

457.51 WHQL tried. Some variation but quite similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jumped to 460.89 WHQL. Insignificant changes in the numbers. 430.97 is still king of the list and probably will stay for 10xx cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

461.40 tried. Mostly slightly down but insignificant changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

461.92 WHQL tried. Every test a little down...That's the problem with old hardware, no benefit of new drivers....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...