Unlisted DEV_ID in registration

July 13, 2005

When I registered I was asked for my DEV_ID - I used NERD to find it, but it wasn't listed in my choices on the registration page.

The code is 0347 - there's only a 0348 and 034C on the registration page. Is this some kind of alternate version of the nVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700?

In any case it might be a good idea to add that to the list of options.

July 13, 2005

Lego,

You are right, there is a Mobile GPU with an ID of 347

I wonder if the 347 has 128MB and the 348 64MB ? very odd.

Anybody with a ZD7000 with the 64MB go5700 confirm this ?

I have since checked all the Mobile GPU's and found 2 other ones go448 (another one) and the go6250.

from v30.74 of my INFs your and the other 2 GPU's will be supported.

So far only 80.40 has the fix.

NERD will also need to be fixed to reflect that very rare GPU.

Cheers for the info so I could fix it. :)

July 13, 2005

We once had them listed in the mobile VideoBIOS backup section. I have moved it to the archive section and pput a question mark in front of it :) . That's indeed a good find, i will add it back and also add it in the registration process/member profile page.

Thanks Legoguy :)

I wonder if the guy who wants to upgrade his 64MB Go5700 (ZD7xxx) can publish his DEV_ID.

®®®

July 13, 2005

Here is latest list of Device ID's

NVIDIA_NV11.DEV_0112.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce2 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0174.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0175.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0176.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go 32M"
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0177.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0179.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go 64M "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_017C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro4 500 GoGL "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_017D.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 410 Go 16M "
NVIDIA_NV18.DEV_0186.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go "
NVIDIA_NV18.DEV_0187.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 488 Go "
NVIDIA_NV18.DEV_018D.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go "
NVIDIA_NV28.DEV_0286.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go "
NVIDIA_NV28.DEV_028C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro4 700 GoGL "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_0316.1 = "NVIDIA NV31M "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_0317.1 = "NVIDIA NV31M Pro "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031A.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031B.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5650 "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 700 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0324.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0325.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5250/5500 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0328.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 32/64M "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_032C.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 53x0 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_032D.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5100 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_0347.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_0348.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_034C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000 "
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00C8.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 "
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00C9.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra"
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00CC.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400 "
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0146.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 TE/6600 TE "
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0148.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0166.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0167.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0168.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400 "

I found (added to v30.34) Dev ID's #018D go448, #0347 go5700, and #0166 go6250

Some GPU's may not be used but I went through all the OEM INFs and added the GPU's from there.

I wonder when to go7800 will surface ?

July 13, 2005

...I wonder when to go7800 will surface ?

I think we will atleast hear about that, and the rest of the cards that will be in the series, pretty soon.

Next couple of weeks or so probably.

July 13, 2005

the missing 0168 ID might be related with user reports of not supported Go5700 (Larry do you remember?). For Pieter: here#s the link to: http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/index.php?showtopic=7350

Also 64bit: http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/index.php?showtopic=7263

Pieter, Larry added 0144 (built in ASUS Z71V and some others). It is cuurently hidden in the Desktop GPU area, so i suggest moving it to the mobile.

:) to both of you

July 13, 2005

Pieter, Larry added 0144 (built in ASUS Z71V and some others). It is cuurently hidden in the Desktop GPU area, so i suggest moving it to the mobile.

Yes I noticed yesterday after I made v30.74.

v30.75 will have this moved and it will also use the mobile parts of the INF.

July 13, 2005

Wow, this topic kind of took off pretty good...

So is that why Windows warned me that it could not verify that the driver would work with my hardware when I went to install it? I didn't realize the 128mb card was so rare :)

Thanks for the quick responses..

Another question now... my desktop computer has an nVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 - which is an NV35 - is this laptop chip 'better' than it, being that it's an NV36? Performance definitley suggests otherwise... or are the laptop chips in a whole other category?

If the information helps, this is what my lspci -vvv says (I dualboot linux..)

0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV36 [GeForce FX Go5700] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company: Unknown device 006a
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 248 (1250ns min, 250ns max)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 209
Region 0: Memory at d1000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
Region 1: Memory at e0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2
 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
 Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [44] AGP version 3.0
 Status: RQ=32 Iso- ArqSz=0 Cal=3 SBA+ ITACoh- GART64- HTrans- 64bit- FW+ AGP3+ Rate=x4,x8
 Command: RQ=32 ArqSz=2 Cal=0 SBA+ AGP+ GART64- 64bit- FW- Rate=x8

July 13, 2005

The topic got off good because mobilenvidia the man himself just got back lol.

Your desktop card is definitely faster, but the laptop one is newer, or it would seem that way, there are probably not any real differences that would make your laptop's card better in any way, besides the addition of extra power features, ect, but in some instances that might be the case.

I guess as far as you are concerned, the laptop chip is probably newer, but that doesn't neccessarily make it faster.

Bill

July 14, 2005

Yeah, I knew it wasn't faster, but i was just wanting to know if it was newer and you obviously answered my question...

Another strange anomoly:

          *-display
               description: VGA compatible controller
               product: NV36 [GeForce FX Go5700]
               vendor: nVidia Corporation
               physical id: 0
               bus info: pci@01:00.0
               version: a1
               size: 256MB
               width: 32 bits
               clock: 66MHz
               capabilities: vga bus_master cap_list
               configuration: driver=nvidia
               resources: iomemory:d1000000-d1ffffff iomemory:e0000000-efffffff irq:209

This (a section from lshw) indicates that it's got 256MB memory - might this be some effect from having SMP (multiprocessor) support enabled so I can take advantage of HyperThreading -- making it appear to have two processors?

July 14, 2005

The 256MB is probably the max addressable memory not the actual memory.

It could also mean it included the AGP apature memory as well.

This is a topic I like, so it gets my attention, I have been away awhile and somethings need to be caught up on.

I should now have all the current mobile GPU's supported, even the ones that exist but were never released.

July 14, 2005

Legoguy, can you post the NERD logfile (i updated the tool some days ago) or did you already post it somewhere :)

best place would be here: http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/index.php?showtopic=6427

Edited July 14, 2005 by ®®®

July 14, 2005

NVIDIA_NV11.DEV_0112.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce2 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0174.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0175.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0176.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go 32M"
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0177.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_0179.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go 64M "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_017C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro4 500 GoGL "
NVIDIA_NV17.DEV_017D.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 410 Go 16M "
NVIDIA_NV18.DEV_0186.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go "
NVIDIA_NV18.DEV_0187.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 488 Go "
NVIDIA_NV18.DEV_018D.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go "
NVIDIA_NV28.DEV_0286.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go "
NVIDIA_NV28.DEV_028C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro4 700 GoGL "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_0316.1 = "NVIDIA NV31M "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_0317.1 = "NVIDIA NV31M Pro "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031A.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031B.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5650 "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 700 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0324.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0325.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5250/5500 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0328.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 32/64M "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_032C.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 53x0 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_032D.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5100 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_0347.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_0348.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_034C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000 "
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00C8.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 "
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00C9.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra"
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00CC.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400 "
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0146.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 TE/6600 TE "
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0148.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0166.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0167.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0168.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400 "

Mobile VideoBIOS section: "NV44 | DEV_ID 0164 GeForce Go 6200"

This seems to be outdated now. It should be 0166 now :P ? As 0168 is now Go 6400 (earlier 6250) i would think that the new 0166 is now the 6250 (instead of 6200) :( :)

I forgot where exactly i got the numbers from. I update this section when new information is available. NV confuses me, they change DEV_IDs every once in a while :)

July 14, 2005

Ok, I uploaded my logfile to that topic. Thanks for taking care of this so quickly!

If you need anything else from me, I'll gladly provide it...

Do you want the BIOS image too?

July 14, 2005

It wouldn't hurt to post your BIOS image, there is a topic for just your card, you could upload it there, others who screwed their cards up would appreciate it if its compatible....

I checked that topic and you indeed posted there, you should attach your BIOS too in that topic.

You should recomend our fast service to all your friends with laptops, or desktop nv cards if they have problems with those. :)

July 15, 2005

You may gave met Bill he is Head of Sales and Marketing :)

July 15, 2005

You may have met Bill he is Head of Sales and Marketing :)

That is one funny quote, might add that somewhere, although my sig is already too bloated....

I was also going to reccomend to that guy to invite his friends with ATI cards to come as we kinda offer ATI support, but decided not too.

®®® probably thinks I was head of the spam department today, or maybe he just doesn't like it when I have more posts in one day than him, only he knows though.

*narraly ducks a swing from ®®®'s mod stick* Promise I will try to cut it down, I did delete that extra post of mine in the gaming section, but anyway...

The thing is though, my number of posts today went down, (not total post count) but I did not notice any missing, except the one I deleted....

Edit: I AM Head of the Fireworks Department right? :)

Edited July 15, 2005 by Bill

July 15, 2005

I didn't really decide not to do ATI, I just don't have time.

Would be nice to also get Mobility Modding (even sounds nice)

July 15, 2005

ATI support wouldn't hurt me of course because my other laptop, an HP ze4560us, has a pos ATI Mobility Radeon U1, aka IGP 320M. Biggest pos possible in a laptop. Linux support for it is very shaky, and on top of that it's just slow... that's one of the reasons why this new (as of about a month ago) laptop absolutely had to have an NVIDIA card...

I could go on and on about why ATI is bad for laptops, yet all of the major OEMs seem to be phasing out NVIDIA as much as they can :)

Unlisted DEV_ID in registration

Recommended Posts

Legoguy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

mobilenvidia

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest Guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

mobilenvidia

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Bill

Link to comment

Share on other sites

®®®

Link to comment

Share on other sites

mobilenvidia

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Legoguy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Bill

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Legoguy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

mobilenvidia

Link to comment

Share on other sites

®®®

Link to comment

Share on other sites

®®®

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Legoguy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Bill

Link to comment

Share on other sites

mobilenvidia

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Bill

Link to comment

Share on other sites

mobilenvidia

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Legoguy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Browse

Activity