zipper Posted May 18, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 How would you feel about benching a x1800? :) Well, with Amilo I'd guess very fast black screen :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 3DMarks05 Score: 3726 Driver: 7770-mobile-[Guru3D.com].exe Flashd to 39.60 Score: 3744 Driver: XG_MobileForce_84.56_v2.40.exe Score: 3746 Driver: 8456 from laptopvideo2go.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted May 18, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 Score: 3746Driver: 8456 from laptopvideo2go.com You could test if this gives boost to your 84.56 - the 84.56 tweakerizer. For me it gave. http://tweaksrus.com/index.php?option=com_...ed&ascdesc=DESC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice-Tea Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 Well, with Amilo I'd guess very fast black screen :) Huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 You are trying to access from a non-authorized domain. (tweaksrus.com) Cant download it :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 Score: 3738 Driver: 8456 / XTreme-G Tweakerizer.v8456.exe Vertical Sync: ON Score: 3768 Driver: 8456 / XTreme-G Tweakerizer.v8456.exe Vertical Sync: OFF Improvments :) So these are the drivers i will intregate in my WinXP CD Thnx from Sonej/Sweden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted May 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Thnx from Sonej/Sweden Var så god :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 91.28 added - fastest on 3DMark06 so far; older benchies not too convincing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Would be intresting to know 3DMark05 score :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted May 24, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 ?? They all are on the first page http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/index.php?showtopic=8245 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted May 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 (edited) added tweakerized 91.28 benchies - speedup again. But overclocks not as well as earlier versions. Edited May 25, 2006 by zipper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted June 6, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2006 91.31 added, std and tweakerized. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Void Posted June 8, 2006 Report Share Posted June 8, 2006 Yeah, went from 3745 to 4102 in 3Dmark05 with tweakerized 84.21 and some oc. :) Thanks zippy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted July 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 91.33 added - might be the best overclocker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted July 20, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 91.37 BSODded during install, perhaps best to get 7950? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted July 31, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 91.37 XTreme-G Mobile Force added, no problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted August 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2006 91.45 added, problems: BSOD during install => no CP at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted August 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2006 91.47 added - no problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted September 10, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2006 91.48 - no problems; me too - performance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted September 14, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 92.91 added - fastish but beats 91.33 not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted September 16, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 92.91 added - fastish but beats 91.33 not. and tweakerizer gives no extra speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
End_of_Eternity Posted September 22, 2006 Report Share Posted September 22, 2006 (edited) Hi guys! I have a Amilo M3438G with a GeForce Go 6800. I am only getting 2982 on 3Dmark05 (1440x900 with 2xAA). GPU Info: No OC, Nvidia 8.4.2.5 with modded INF file (from these forums) flashed GPU BIOS from .39 to .60 General Info: 2.0 GHz Pentium D 1 GB RAM Latest drivers for LAN/Wireless/RAID WinXP Pro /w updates Background services: Standard stuff + AVG Zonealarm Any idea on how I can improve my score to something like 3800? Edited September 22, 2006 by End_of_Eternity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabrice Roux Posted September 22, 2006 Report Share Posted September 22, 2006 Any idea on how I can improve my score to something like 3800? I tought you were playing dumb... but given that you spilled such a long post... it's kinda scary. :) Run the benchmark in it's default resolution without ressources hogs such as FSAA. Do you REALLY think you'll get the same result when running the benchmark at 800x600 and 1600x1200? (4 times more pixels) Keep in mind that benchmarks are not meant to do pissing contests... if you want to do pissing contest at least do an apple to apple comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipper Posted September 22, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2006 Run the benchmark in it's default resolution without ressources hogs such as FSAA. As the default what normally is used is 1024x768 and your 1440x900 puts 60% more strain, I have no idea what the "normal" result is. Perhaps some eerie has done it in Futuremark ORB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
End_of_Eternity Posted September 22, 2006 Report Share Posted September 22, 2006 As the default what normally is used is 1024x768 and your 1440x900 puts 60% more strain,I have no idea what the "normal" result is. Perhaps some eerie has done it in Futuremark ORB? Oh, so your benchies use 1024x768 without AA. I was under the impression that you were using 1440x900. :P I tought you were playing dumb... but given that you spilled such a long post... it's kinda scary. :) Run the benchmark in it's default resolution without ressources hogs such as FSAA. Do you REALLY think you'll get the same result when running the benchmark at 800x600 and 1600x1200? (4 times more pixels) Keep in mind that benchmarks are not meant to do pissing contests... if you want to do pissing contest at least do an apple to apple comparison. No I don't think the benchmarks scores would be the same, I was under the impression that zipper was using 1440x900. And I perfectly know that benchmarking isn't a pissing contest. :) The Amilo Amilo M3438G has a history of needing mods/hack (flashing gpu ROM, hacked INF files) to get it to perform normally. I wanted to make sure that I did not miss out any of the additional steps required to get the 'real performance' from my machine. I am not a regular here, so I had no idea that zipper was using 1024x768, otherwise I would have never asked what I asked. There was no need to get pissed off, a simple "zipper is using 1024x768" would be sufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.